 |
|
 |

 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I got four large galvanised steel planters at Ikea. Today I drilled holes in the bottom and filled each of them with half a bag of red lava rock and potting soil to just below the rim. I've also watered them. The plants I bought at Annie's Annuals in Richmond are soaking in the bath tub while I decide how to plant them. The colour scheme is pale yellow combined with hot pink and dark purple. These are the plants I've got:
- 3 Fragaria vesca 'Golden Alexandria', height 12", yellow foliage, red berries, sun to part shade, average water
- 3 Fragaria vesca 'White Delight', height 12", green foliage, white berries, sun to part shade, average water
- 3 Viola 'Etain', height 10", light yellow flowers with lavender edge, sun to part shade, average water
- 3 Salpiglossis 'Kew Blue', height 2', velvety purple, sun, average water
- 3 Dianthus gratianopolitanus 'Grandiflora', height 12", hot pink, fragrant, sun, average to low water
- 3 Scabiosa ochroleuca, height 2', light yellow pin cushions, sun, low water
- 1 Alcea rugosa, height 5', light yellow flowers, sun, average water
- 1 Lobelia speciosa 'Fan Blue', height 24", blue spikes, sun to part shade, average water
- 1 Ipomoea tricolor 'Tickle me Pink', height 8', pink morning glory flowers, sun, average water
Now to decide how to combine them. Obviously I want the three specimen plants in separate pots. That leaves me with one pot with no centerpiece. That's OK. I'll go for a sort of meadow effect in that container. Next I don't want flowers of the same colour combined. So, e.g. the yellow hollyhock will not share a pot with the scabious, because they're yellow too. I'm going for contrast. This is what I've come up with. Feedback welcome. Pot A1 Alcea rugosa, yellow 3 Salpiglossis, purple Pot B1 Lobelia speciosa, purple 2 Viola 'Etain', yellow Pot C1 Ipomoea tricolor, pink 3 Fragaria vesca 'White Delight' 3 Fragaria vesca 'Golden Alexandria' Pot D3 Dianthus gratianopolitanus, pink 3 Scabiosa ochroleuca, yellow Alas, it's now dark so the actual planting will have to wait until tomorrow. Tags: garden Current Location: north san jose mood: müde
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |








 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
The Associated Press' science writer, Malcolm Ritter, wrote about a study published in Wednesday's issue of Neurology. At SFgate.com the article had the heading Big Belly Boosts Risk of Later Dementia. This is exactly the kind of headline that makes Sandy Szwarc, the Junkfood Science blogger, see red. In an article with the headline Computer Gaming: Your waist doesn’t really go to your head, she picks apart the study and the media coverage of it. Szwarc starts out by discussing how to recognise when supposedly scientific findings are used for marketing purposes. Then she goes on to point out the flaws in the study. Some of these are: Dementia was defined as corresponding to certain billing records in Kaiser Permanente's invoice system. Among the codes included was the one for "memory impairment." Needless to say, not all memory impairment is dementia, not even for the elderly. Even Wikipedia is more stringent when defining dementiaas "the progressive decline in cognitive function due to damage or disease in the brain beyond what might be expected from normal aging." According to the Merck Manual of Geriatrics "Diagnosing dementia is extremely imprecise and requires a very thorough physical evaluation to differentiate it from benign age-related memory loss. It also needs to be differentiated from a lot of treatable conditions that mimic dementia among elderly, such as the effects of illness; prescription medications; hypothyroidism; vitamin B12 deficiency; depression and isolation; and poor oxygenation due to lung, heart or circulation problems." 75% of original cohort was excluded and there is no data on how they differed from those that were included in the study. In addition, although the 2008 study reported this week uses the same data as one from 2005, there are unexplained differences in the results. Finally, this was a retrospective study, i.e. it looked at records of past events and tried to draw conclusions from these. Retrospective studies are considered the weakest type of observational study and should be used mainly for generating hypothesis. Read the AP "science" article and Szwarc critique of the study side by side to get the full view. Szwarc also has a number of interesting articles on the so called obesity paradox. Tags: health, linkage Current Location: east bay hotel mood: wach
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

|